Dear Yetta,

I enjoy use meets, vests and ties at the job. But my work lately imposed a gender-specific outfit code policy that makes it necessary for females to wear skirts and blouses. Is it allowable?

— Stephanie

Dear Stephanie,

Good question. Title VII of civil-rights Act of 1964 is actually a national law that forbids employers from discerning against staff on the basis of sex, competition, shade, nationwide source and religion. Previous courtroom situations in addition to Equal Employment chance Com­mission’s (EEOC) interpretation and administration of Title VII have shown that gender-specific gown signal guidelines may break Title VII.

Until not too long ago, many courts are finding dress rule plans permissible under Title VII whenever it distinguishes between amount of locks, piercings, and clothes or skirts for ladies and matches and links for males.


However, recent process of law discovered that a gender-specific dress signal plan will violate Title VII if discovered to be a lot more burdensome on a single gender compared to other. Imposing a dress signal on one gender but not one other may represent a violation under Title VII.

Besides, the EEOC, which can be in charge of implementing federal statutes making it unlawful to discriminate against a member of staff considering gender, has actually translated and enforced the Title VII prohibition of intimate discrimination as forbidding any work discrimination based on sex identity or intimate positioning. Therefore, the EEOC provides determined that companies may set gender-specific dress codes but may well not opt for the worker which sex to follow.

As a result of complexity of this legal landscape relating to gender-specific outfit requirements, it’s best to consult a lawyer with discrimination experience to discuss not simply national, but condition regulations that could afford you added defenses against intercourse discrimination. I hope this really is useful. Best of luck!

— Yetta

E-mail questions to

[email protected]

or call 212-253-6911.

This line just isn’t a session with a legal professional and must by no means be construed as a result or instead for these assessment. A person with legalities or concerns should look for the recommendations of one’s own lawyer.